<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr: Two new subtle geo updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/flickr-two-new-subtle-geo-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/flickr-two-new-subtle-geo-updates/</link>
	<description>Maps and Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:16:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RevDanCatt</title>
		<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/flickr-two-new-subtle-geo-updates/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RevDanCatt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geobloggers.com/archives/2007/04/12/flickr-two-new-subtle-geo-updates/#comment-1280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Dave&lt;/b&gt;: We turned them off over the weekend to test a couple of things. We had unusual load on the servers and was wondering if someone was trying to scrape location data from flickr. Which would seem odd as we have geonames.org. Anyway, it wasn&#039;t that so that are back on now.

&lt;b&gt;Barry&lt;/b&gt;: I think it&#039;s probably better for Google to fix that at their end, I&#039;m sure a quick prod will get that sorted. If we were going to drop down to one standard it&#039;s probably be the W3C version rather than the GeoRSS one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Dave</b>: We turned them off over the weekend to test a couple of things. We had unusual load on the servers and was wondering if someone was trying to scrape location data from flickr. Which would seem odd as we have geonames.org. Anyway, it wasn&#8217;t that so that are back on now.</p>
<p><b>Barry</b>: I think it&#8217;s probably better for Google to fix that at their end, I&#8217;m sure a quick prod will get that sorted. If we were going to drop down to one standard it&#8217;s probably be the W3C version rather than the GeoRSS one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Hunter</title>
		<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/flickr-two-new-subtle-geo-updates/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Hunter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geobloggers.com/archives/2007/04/12/flickr-two-new-subtle-geo-updates/#comment-1279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure if this is really relevant here, but it seems that Google at least doesn&#039;t cope correctly with having two GeoRSS flavours in a feed:

http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API/browse_thread/thread/f22fe120bd1bbc83

IMHO it should only be outputting GeoRSS simple - but I understand in reality need to cope with the widest possible number of readers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if this is really relevant here, but it seems that Google at least doesn&#8217;t cope correctly with having two GeoRSS flavours in a feed:</p>
<p><a href="http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API/browse_thread/thread/f22fe120bd1bbc83" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API/browse_thread/thread/f22fe120bd1bbc83</a></p>
<p>IMHO it should only be outputting GeoRSS simple &#8211; but I understand in reality need to cope with the widest possible number of readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Beckett</title>
		<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/flickr-two-new-subtle-geo-updates/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Beckett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geobloggers.com/archives/2007/04/12/flickr-two-new-subtle-geo-updates/#comment-1278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The example in #1. Location stuff in flickr.photo.getInfo isn&#039;t working right now with the URL you gave. Was it turned off?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The example in #1. Location stuff in flickr.photo.getInfo isn&#8217;t working right now with the URL you gave. Was it turned off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

