<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geotagging at the rate of 43 every minute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/</link>
	<description>Maps and Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:16:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo! Research Berkeley &#187; Introducing: World Explorer and Tag Maps</title>
		<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yahoo! Research Berkeley &#187; Introducing: World Explorer and Tag Maps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geobloggers.com/archives/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We use the public geotagged photos contributed to the world by the lively and active Flickr community, and the tags associated with these images, to help you explore the world like never before. Our system automatically extracts the tags that are relevant and representative for each map region or zoom level &#8212; and connects these tags to the photos that represent that area. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We use the public geotagged photos contributed to the world by the lively and active Flickr community, and the tags associated with these images, to help you explore the world like never before. Our system automatically extracts the tags that are relevant and representative for each map region or zoom level &#8212; and connects these tags to the photos that represent that area. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normangaz</title>
		<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[normangaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geobloggers.com/archives/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi again guys! Nice site and forum.
I need some help where i can read more about this problema?
I tried http://google.com , but with no succes.
Please help me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again guys! Nice site and forum.<br />
I need some help where i can read more about this problema?<br />
I tried <a href="http://google.com" rel="nofollow">http://google.com</a> , but with no succes.<br />
Please help me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ucakkurzxg</title>
		<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ucakkurzxg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geobloggers.com/archives/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello guys! I have some questions. I mean need some help.
Where i can read more about this problema?
Please, don&#039;t derect me to http://google.com i know about it.
Please derect me with some links.
thanks!
UCAKK^^]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello guys! I have some questions. I mean need some help.<br />
Where i can read more about this problema?<br />
Please, don&#8217;t derect me to <a href="http://google.com" rel="nofollow">http://google.com</a> i know about it.<br />
Please derect me with some links.<br />
thanks!<br />
UCAKK^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Karr</title>
		<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Karr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 02:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geobloggers.com/archives/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just launched a neat little tool tonight to generate your site&#039;s geotags for you.  Hope you like it:  http://www.addressfix.com

Doug]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just launched a neat little tool tonight to generate your site&#8217;s geotags for you.  Hope you like it:  <a href="http://www.addressfix.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.addressfix.com</a></p>
<p>Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matteo Penzo</title>
		<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matteo Penzo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geobloggers.com/archives/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks RevDanCatt for including Mobup in your list ;-)

My opinion is that both cameraphones and cameras will converge to something that can:

1) take a photo
2) augment its conveied message through title, description, tags, ...
3) geotag it
4) UPLOAD IT online (!!)

I think number four sets the difference between what Marc says (just drop a GPS chip in a camera and you&#039;re done) and what i think (I want to shoot, enrich and upload the photo right here and right now).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks RevDanCatt for including Mobup in your list ;-)</p>
<p>My opinion is that both cameraphones and cameras will converge to something that can:</p>
<p>1) take a photo<br />
2) augment its conveied message through title, description, tags, &#8230;<br />
3) geotag it<br />
4) UPLOAD IT online (!!)</p>
<p>I think number four sets the difference between what Marc says (just drop a GPS chip in a camera and you&#8217;re done) and what i think (I want to shoot, enrich and upload the photo right here and right now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTBGuru</title>
		<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MTBGuru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geobloggers.com/archives/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We just came out with another feature that may also be helping this trend:
you can now easily publish your maps+tracks+geotagged pics on your own site or blog, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.mtbguru.com/2006/12/14/publish-your-own-map/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this example&lt;/a&gt;.
It works by copying/pasting a line of code which basically loads an iframe and hence works in almost everything that parses html (blogs, forum posts, etc). Not working yet in Safari on Mac but we&#039;re working on that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just came out with another feature that may also be helping this trend:<br />
you can now easily publish your maps+tracks+geotagged pics on your own site or blog, see <a href="http://blog.mtbguru.com/2006/12/14/publish-your-own-map/" rel="nofollow">this example</a>.<br />
It works by copying/pasting a line of code which basically loads an iframe and hence works in almost everything that parses html (blogs, forum posts, etc). Not working yet in Safari on Mac but we&#8217;re working on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RevDanCatt</title>
		<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RevDanCatt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geobloggers.com/archives/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re right, but we&#039;ll see more GPS in cameras in 2007.

As I&#039;ve mentioned before as people turn away from megapixels as being a differentiating factor between cameras, the manufactures will turn to other things such as GPS. Probably from unbranded cheap eastern imports first, before the big players catch up.

Of course it&#039;s only now that all of us consumers have started to create a need and demand that&#039;s it&#039;s happening :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right, but we&#8217;ll see more GPS in cameras in 2007.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve mentioned before as people turn away from megapixels as being a differentiating factor between cameras, the manufactures will turn to other things such as GPS. Probably from unbranded cheap eastern imports first, before the big players catch up.</p>
<p>Of course it&#8217;s only now that all of us consumers have started to create a need and demand that&#8217;s it&#8217;s happening :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://geobloggers.wordpress.com/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geobloggers.com/archives/2006/12/11/geotagging-at-the-rate-of-43-every-minute/#comment-492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi I read recently that it costs something in the region of Â£4 for manurfactures to install GPS chips. It seems to me that most people would be happy to pay Â£100 extra for a camera with GPS automatically and simply integrated, like the time and all the other camera details are in the exif, without having to mess around with google maps/earth/[an other geotagging software].

As far as I can tell the Ricoh G3 is the only one available and is both ugly and expensive.

Surely this is a simple and obvious market decision for the camera makers!!

It seems we are much more likely to see and mobile phone with a GPS/location software and a 5M pixel camera than we are to see a 5M pixel camera with a GPS built it.

Which I for one think is a shame?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I read recently that it costs something in the region of Â£4 for manurfactures to install GPS chips. It seems to me that most people would be happy to pay Â£100 extra for a camera with GPS automatically and simply integrated, like the time and all the other camera details are in the exif, without having to mess around with google maps/earth/[an other geotagging software].</p>
<p>As far as I can tell the Ricoh G3 is the only one available and is both ugly and expensive.</p>
<p>Surely this is a simple and obvious market decision for the camera makers!!</p>
<p>It seems we are much more likely to see and mobile phone with a GPS/location software and a 5M pixel camera than we are to see a 5M pixel camera with a GPS built it.</p>
<p>Which I for one think is a shame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

